The
following is an excerpt from a series of e-mail conversations with Katharine
Myers. Katharine's history with psychological type and with her mother-in-law,
Isabel Myers, is rich in depth and breadth. She has made notable contributions
to the type community, including "An Introduction to Type" and "An Introduction
to Type Dynamics and Development." This particular contribution was from
an e-mail correspondence on November 25, 2002.
I think Type and Temperament
are two different but complementary theories which can be used effectively
in conjunction with each other. This enriches both, especially as temperament
has been developed by Linda Berens.
My
introduction to Temperament Theory came when I moved to Torrance, CA in
1973. While waiting for the California Board to decide that Pennsylvania
had showed sound judgment in certifying me as a school counselor and counselor
K-12, I volunteered in the Torrance High School Career Center.
At
that time, the Indicator was not widely known, but was developing pockets
of use around the country. (Japan was the major user.) I was astonished
and delighted to find stacks of copies of Isabel's type descriptions on
the shelves of the center - and puzzled. On inquiry, I learned that someone
called David Keirsey had introduced type and temperament theory to the
students and teachers at Torrance High School.
Later
(1975), I learned that Alan Brownsword, a Director with me on the first
CAPT board, was a good friend of David's and thought highly of his work.
At that time, David was in the process of finishing "Please Understand
Me" and had shared some of the chapters and his 16 descriptions with Alan
who shared them with me. In 1979, when Alan and I were both on the Planning
Committee of the 1979 conference, we recommended to the Committee that
David be invited to be the plenary speaker and they agreed.
When
Margaret Hartzler and I developed the Institute for Type Development (now
Type Resources) Qualifying Program in 1983, we incorporated a segment
on Temperament Theory. It certainly was introductory, but we thought it
important for practitioners to know of it, what it was about as well as
how it could be used in conjunction with type. Throughout my active career
I used temperament as well as type exercises.
I
was always distressed at the split that developed among some of the type
community and remember speaking on the complementarity of the two theories
at an APT Chapter speech in the Bay area as a small gesture towards healing.
Page
2, A Conversation with Katharine Myers >>>
|